Checklist

Mayor’s Roadmap Checklist

This checklist summarizes the six key priorities to guide mayors and city leaders on how to replace lead pipes in their communities within 10 years and protect their residents from lead in drinking water.

Read More
Checklist

Financial Plan Checklist for Lead Service Line Replacement

This checklist provides a step-by-step guide to developing a thoughtful financial plan for long-term success of your LSLR program.

Read More
Workers replacing lead pipes

Automatic Enrollment Policies Can Make Lead Service Line Replacement Projects More Efficient and Expedient

This blog explains how automatic enrollment policies to streamline lead service line replacement programs, reducing customer barriers and administrative burdens to accelerate the delivery of safe drinking water.

Read More
Milwaukee

Milwaukee’s Lead Pipe Program Boosts Local Jobs & Apprenticeships

Milwaukee Water Works requires that 40% of lead pipe replacement work go to RPP participants, with larger contracts prioritizing those in high-poverty areas.

Read More
Minnesota Statutes

Minnesota statute requires allows the use of state funding to repay loans

Minnesota’s Lead Service Line Replacement Grant Program prioritizes the use grant funds to repay loans incurred for LSLR including DWSRF loans. Minn. Stat. 446A.077 §4(a).

Read More
Funding

Wisconsin Lead Service Line Replacement Program – BIL Funding Amendment to SFY 2023 SDWLP Intended Use Plan

Wisconsin’s SFY23 Intended Use Plan (IUP) made additional financial assistance for inventory available through set-aside funds (p. 1).

Read More
Glass of water

State of Pennsylvania – Drinking Water State Revolving Loan Fund Intended Use Plan (IUP) – SFY 2022

The state’s SFY22 IUP assgined additional priority points based economic development criteria promoting job creation (Attachment 1, p. 2).

Read More
Two multiracial girls sit in kitchen drinking water

State of Wisconsin –Safe Drinking Water Loan Program Intended Use Plan for the SFY 2025 Funding Cycle

The SFY25 IUP limits SRF funding to projects that fully remove lead components (p. 18). It also allows multi-year applications for lead line replacements (p. 20), prioritizes collaborative applicants (p. 13), and offers principal forgiveness for private-side work and filters (p. 19).

Read More
Lead pipes

New Jersey law requires full LSLR

New Jersey requires the replacement of all lead and galvanized service lines, including the private portion, and enables water utilities to recover private-side replacement costs through water rates. P.L. 2021 c.183 §5 (a-b).

Read More
Indiana Statehouse

Indiana enables municipalities to mandate LSLR, implement automatic enrollment, customer opt-out and occupant-permitted access

State law expressly allows municipalities to mandate replacement as part of their LSLR program. Ind. Code Ann. § 8-1-31.6-6. It also permitsdefault enrollment by requiring proof of replacement. Ind. Code Ann. § 8-1-31.6-6(d)(2),(4).Utilities can access private property if landlords are unresponsive Ind. Code Ann. § 8-1-31.6-6(d)(2) and may disconnect service if owners block replacement work Ind. Code § 8-1-31.6-6(d)(4).

Read More

Milwaukee is one of the few cities in the country with a prioritization plan to ensure neighborhoods likely to suffer the most severe impacts from lead poisoning get their pipes replaced first. In consultation with a community-based group, Coalition for Lead Emergency (COLE), and following a public engagement process, Milwaukee included in an ordinance three indicators to prioritize where LSLs will be removed first:

  1. The area deprivation index (ADI), which is a compilation of social determinants of health
  2. The percentage of children found to have elevated lead levels in their blood when tested for lead poisoning
  3. The density of lead service lines in the neighborhood.

Read more here.